Last week, the Templeton Foundation announced that Francis Collins was the 2020 winner of their annual prize recognizing contributions to the dialogue between science and the deep questions our world and ourselves. Collins has made substantial contributions to biomedical science, helping to identify genes for conditions like cystic fibrosis and Huntington’s disease before going on to lead the Human Genome Project. He is also a notable participant in the dialogue between science and Christian religion, most prominently via his book The Language of God and the BioLogos Foundation that grew out of responses to the book. And if that weren’t enough, he has been the director of the National Institutes of Health for the past 12 years and so is currently providing leadership on the pandemic response and the research efforts to find therapies and vaccines.
[Read more…] about Science Corner: Congratulations, Templeton Prize Winner Francis Collins
francis collins
Science Corner: 2019 BioLogos Conference Recap
Last week I had the opportunity to attend the BioLogos conference in Baltimore, MD. Although there is a healthy dose of science, their conferences have a different feel than American Scientific Affiliation meetings, or at least the one I attended. ASA is primarily focused on scientists and students in the sciences, while BioLogos positions itself to address a broader audience. As a result, their conference attracts pastors, middle and high school teachers and interested members of the public in addition to an assortment of academics in the sciences, philosophy, history, theology, and other disciplines.
To serve this audience, the meeting is oriented around plenary talks and cultivating the sense of a single shared conversation, rather than discipline-specific conversations in different tracks. These plenary talks were recorded and can be streamed online now; a single fee provides access to all the talks. While that fee is a considerable bargain compared to the expense of traveling to and attending the meeting in person, it may not fit into everyone’s budget. So I’ve written brief reflections on each talk to help you assess the value proposition of purchasing streaming access. Also, be sure to check out an upcoming free talk linked at the bottom of this post.
What Do You Believe, Doctor? – BioLogos founder and current NIH director Francis Collins shared how he came to follow Jesus early in his medical career, having previously not seen a need for religion in his life. Collins has the affable and reassuring disposition you’d want in a family doctor but might not expect from one of the world’s leading scientists and policymakers. It’s obvious why his story has resonated so strongly with so many.
Science, Faith, & Public Witness – Pastor John Ortburg shared what I felt was primarily a message of encouragement and exhortation to the scientists in attendance. He focused on 4 gifts that scientists can offer our brothers & sisters and our neighbors. As a pastor ministering in Silicon Valley, he obviously has plenty of opportunities to interact with those in STEM fields and clearly has a lot of respect for such folks.
Creation: Rediscovering a Misunderstood Doctrine – Theologian and historian Justo González reminded us all that creation is not just a doctrine about past events and a causal chain extending back to a first cause. That’s the scientific perspective on creation; the doctrine of creation is much richer.
Science and its Limits: Properly Receiving God’s Good Gift – Philosopher Timothy O’Connor took up the issue of scientism and the limits of what science can tell us, both about the physical world and about the sum total of all truth. I’ve recently had conversations with folks who expressed concern that BioLogos and evolutionary creationism represented an overconfidence in science, so I found this session to be particularly timely.
Life Beyond Earth: What Would it Mean for Christians? – This might be the densest presentation, science-wise. Astrophysicist Jennifer Wiseman recaps our recent advances in exoplanet discovery: what we’ve found, how we found them, how we might be able to identify signatures of life. Astrobiologist Stephen Freeland discusses the remarkably robust nature of microbial life and how pervasive and persistent it can be. Finally, astronomer and BioLogos president Deborah Haarsma surveys some of the theological questions associated with the topic of intelligent life elsewhere in the cosmos.
Night at the Aquarium: Christians and Creation Care – I’m sorry to say I did not purchase the additional ticket to attend this lecture at the aquarium, having been to the aquarium several times as a grad student.
Animal Suffering: God and Pain in the Evolutionary Story – Bethany Sollereder, a science & religion scholar, took up the challenging topic of theodicy through the particular lens of animal suffering. I presume Sollereder is or has been a teacher, since she helpfully began by surveying the breadth of possible approaches to the question of animal suffering before describing her personal approach. While not necessarily giving them equal time, I thought she gave all the views a clear and fair explanation. I also found her particular approach to make a lot of sense.
Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: Embryos & Ethics – Biologist Jeff Hardin describes how developing humans change shape over time as they transition from single-celled zygotes to infants. He has plenty of images and videos that inspire ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’. Then he explores some of the ethical questions around reproductive technologies and stem-cell-based therapies, such as what to do with embryos fertilized in surplus of what wound up being needed for achieving a pregnancy. He probably raises more questions than he offers answers for, acknowledging the need for policy experts and ethicists to contribute, but does offer some guidance.
Speaking God in a Scientific World: Reviving our Sacred Vocabulary – I was the most intrigued by journalist Jonathan Merritt’s premise, but ultimately found his talk underwhelming in execution. He makes an impassioned case for a decline in usage and understanding of sacred vocabulary (although I’m not entirely clear on whether Google n-gram data shows what he says it shows) and a need to transform our language to keep it alive. But no specifics are provided, nor is much of a connection made to a specifically “scientific world.†Eventually it became clear the details of transformation were saved for his new book; one or two examples would have been appreciated.
BioLogos 10th Anniversary Banquet – Francis Collins provides a history of the early days of BioLogos, then offers some commentary on where he thinks it should go in the next decade. He spent the most time making a case for leadership in the area of bioethics. His primary use case was the application of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology, which shows real therapeutic promise when used in somatic cells and which raises many concerns when used in embryos and germline cells. Few if any individuals are more qualified to speak to this topic.
Unfortunately, due to other obligations I had to leave prior to Richard Mouw’s presentation.
During the conference, BioLogos also launched a podcast called The Language of God. Four episodes are available so far, including conversations with conference speakers Francis Collins and Jennifer Wiseman, if you want a further sense of their style and perspective.
And in other live streaming but non-BioLogos news, mathematician and ESN member Francis Su will be giving a talk entitled The Integration of Faith and the Academic Calling at 12pm EDT tomorrow (4/4/19). You can register for a free video stream here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_HD8yXl0wTdSyxHMcIDtu8A
Does science rule out God?
This is the second in a series of blog posts concerned with Christian questions about evolution. A major question for me after I became a Christian was: Does science in general and evolution in particular rule out God? I know that is also a question that troubles many Christians. You may remember that in my first post on the Mechanism of Creation, the View from Science, I said that there were four meanings of evolution. The first three change over time, common descent, evolution by natural selection are conclusions based on scientific evidence. I have put off discussion of the fourth meaning until now. That fourth meaning views evolution as a justification for atheism. In this post, I’m going to show that this meaning is a world-view interpretation of the scientific findings, not a conclusion from science. First, not all scientists are atheists. To be sure several recent books by more fervent atheists claim that science in general and evolution in particular disproves God. Perhaps the best known example is The God Delusion by the biologist Richard Dawkins. Dawkins has famously stated that “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.†Two other examples are Daniel Dennett’s Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon and Victor Stenger’s God the Failed Hypothesis.
However, there are other well-known scientists who believe that evolution is perfectly compatible with their Christian faith. Examples are Asa Gray who is widely regarded as the most important American botanist of 19th century, Theodosius Dobzhansky, a geneticist and evolutionary biologist, who was instrumental in shaping the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology with genetics and Francis Collins, a geneticist and former Director of the U.S. Human Genome Project, who recently wrote the book, The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. Here is the key point. Science is a wonderful and very productive tool for studying nature. But since God exists outside of nature the question of God is not approachable by the empirical methods used by science. Thus science does not have the competency to make definitive statements about the existence or lack of existence of God! [Read more…] about Does science rule out God?
Book Review: The Language of God
The value of The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief is that it was written by the Director of the Human Genome Project. Francis Collins’[1] personal narrative of coming to faith and his sometimes eloquent plea for an end to the warfare between science and faith are the most valuable parts of the book. These are the strengths of The Language of God and worth the price of admission if you have not heard his story. Likewise, Collins gives a good, if relatively brief, narrative of his work in genomics and the human genome project and some sense of why he thinks this was such a worthy endeavor to pursue both as scientist and Christian.
On other counts, I would rate this book “just OK”. Collins’ apologetic for faith is derived from C.S. Lewis and I would say here, “read Lewis”! [Read more…] about Book Review: The Language of God
Are “agnostic” scientists really agnostic?
Last week, I became engaged in a rather lengthy online conversation about the religious faith of university scientists. It was prompted by this GetReligion post about Francis Collins. In my comments, I cited Rice sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund’s recent book Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think, as well as her online article “Religion and Spirituality among University Scientists” (PDF). Ecklund’s research examines the religious beliefs and practices of university scientists, with some important findings – such as a much higher rate of religiosity than usually assumed.
Another commenter, though, noted a strange statistic: the number of scientists who consider themselves religious and/or spiritual actually outnumbers the number who say they believe in God. About half (48%) of scientists say they belong to a religious tradition, and 66% consider themselves to be a “spiritual person.” Yet more than half gave classic atheist or agnostic responses when asked whether God exists.
When asked their beliefs about God, nearly 34 percent of academic scientists answer “I do not believe in God†and about 30 percent answer “I do not know if there is a God and there is no way to find out,†the classic agnostic response. This means that over 60 percent of professors in these natural and social science disciplines describe themselves as either atheist or religiously agnostic. In comparison, among those in the general U.S. population, about 3 percent claim to be atheists and about 5 percent are religiously agnostic. (Ecklund, “Religion and Spirituality”)
What are we to make of this apparent contradiction? While I was jogging on Saturday, a thought occurred to me: What if this “agnostic” response is actually an expression of the scientists’ refined understanding of knowledge according to naturalism and the scientific method?
My reasoning is after the jump. [Read more…] about Are “agnostic” scientists really agnostic?