Kuyper’s Vision of Sin and Redemption

Abraham Kuyper: A Short and Personal Introduction by Richard Mouw (Eerdmans, 2011).

Abraham Kuyper: A Short and Personal Introduction by Richard Mouw (Eerdmans, 2011).

Second post in a series drawing from and interacting with Richard Mouw’s Abraham Kuyper: A Short and Personal Introduction (Eerdmans, 2011). If you missed it, you may desire to start at the beginning of the series with The Lure of Kuyper.


Following the biblical narrative, Kuyper holds:

when Eve and Adam succumbed to the Serpent’s challenge, then, they turned their wills away from God and placed their ultimate trust in something less than God. (Mouw, 10)

This turning of the will, not necessarily the act, is the first sin. Kuyper reminds us that when we sin in the heart we sin in the flesh, echoing the words of Christ. Sin is not merely an act for Kuyper. Too often we focus on what we do and call that sin. This allows us to forget that sin is a condition placed upon us by our rebellion. We are cursed not just by Death, but to live under the shadow of death the rest of our lives.

For Kuyper, “Sin does not consist simply in the awareness of our finitude, or a basic anxiety that emerges out of that awareness. The Fall was not about finitude as such, since human beings were at one time both finite and unfallen. What introduced sin into the created order was an act of will, a rebellion against the command of God.” (9) Sin did not introduce finitude. We were created, in Kuyper’s thought, finite for only God is infinite. This in contrast to St. Thomas Aquinas’ view that we were created as infinite but not eternal. In Aquinas’ thought, only God is without beginning or end, which is to say eternal. For Aquinas and Catholic doctrine, Adam and Eve were infinite, with beginning but not end. In Kuyper’s reading of creation, we are with beginning and with end. We began with Creation and will end in Redemptive Consummation. Death was always in play, but death was not always negative. For Kuyper, death was natural and part of the limitations of the flesh. Matter, for Kuyper, following Augustine, is fallible, malleable and can break down. Finitude is not the problem for Kuyper. The problem for Kuyper is that we, in our finitude, rebelled against the infinite.

Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narratives by Peter C. Bouteneff (Baker, 2008).

Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narratives by Peter C. Bouteneff (Baker, 2008).

This rebellion did not bring about the need for Redemption, however. Redemption, which is to say the bringing Creation in line with God’s will, always was. Creation is Redemption and Redemption is Creation, following some of the Church Fathers. (For more on this, see Peter Bouteneff’s book entitled Beginnings.) Creation is an expression of God’s love and will and is a necessary outpouring of God. It is no accident that God created not just the world, but the Cosmos, all that exists. If God created all as part of His divine will, then it is logically and theologically sound to say that God is redeeming all of the Cosmos. “This points us to a much bigger Christ than is often understood by evangelicals” (13) who tend to focus only on humans and their souls.

After Creation, God issued the decree found in Genesis 1:28, to go forth and multiply and to subdue the earth and have dominion over all of it. In this, humanity was entrusted to care for all that God created and to help it flourish. With this command, culture was created. We have the culture of the animals, plants, and humans. We have the culture of those that care for the land. We have the culture of those that care for other humans. We have the culture of those that provide sustenance. All in all, we have the creation of all of culture.

Sin did not put an end to this decree. This decree continued forth and is still sustained. What sin did is stain the creation, pervert the culture of care, and bringing in sharper focus the need for grace in this task. It is, and will always be part of God’s will to bring Creation and Creature closer to himself.

In one of Kuyper’s seemingly more controversial statements, he declares that Jesus “did not come to do something brand new” (14) . The work of Christ was present in Creation, in spreading God’s love. This mission never changed. “Jesus came to redeem the creation” not to create again. Jesus came “to cleanse” the cosmos from the depravity that permeates the cosmos.” Jesus came to “fix what had been broken by sin.” (14) Nothing is new, everything is a continuation of God’s creative and redemptive acts. Kuyper asks to ponder this:

galaxy photo

Black Holes May Shape Galaxies (NASA, Chandra, Hubble, 03/03/10) by NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center

Can we imagine that at one time God willed to rule things in a certain moral order, but that now, in Christ, He wills to rule it otherwise? As though He were not the Eternal, the Unchangeable, Who, from the very hour of creation, even unto all eternity, had willed, wills, and shall will and maintain, one and the same firm moral world-order! (Lectures on Calvinism71-72)

If we hold that Christ came to do something new, to change the world order, we hold that he is not the same God that created all, but a new divinity taking over. This, in Kuyper’s mind is absurd. Christ wills and will always will the same.

From the outset of Genesis 1:28, we are called to help in the redemptive process. We are not to only care for ourselves, or other humans, but the whole of created order. Christ came not to redeem humans. Christ came to redeem all of His Created Order and remove the stain of corruption from all that exists. “Our discipleship includes cultural obedience” (15), that is to say, if Christ’s concern is all of Creation, it is our concern also.


The next post in the series will explore Kuyper’s View of Creation.

Photo by NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center

Print Friendly
danjesse@gmail.com'

Dan Jesse

Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at Grand Rapids Community College and Kendall College of Art and Design. MA in Philosophical Theology from the Institute for Christian Studies, BA in Philosophy and Worldview Studies from Cornerstone University.

More Posts

4 Comments

  • bbdemy99@hotmail.com'
    Bob Demyanovich commented on September 13, 2014 Reply

    The mark of Jesus Christ not the mark of the Beast. This is the Sabbath of God, the testimony of Jesus.

    Prophets of Strong Drink – Part 2 – Fashioning Sin’s Image
    This is the second video in a series addressing the nature of false prophecy.
    http://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM

  • Tom Grosh IV commented on September 13, 2014 Reply

    Dear Bob,

    Thank-you for your comment. Please elaborate on

    1. how you understand the relationship between “Prophets of Strong Drink – Part 2 – Fashioning Sin’s Image” and “Kuyper’s Vision of Sin and Redemption”.

    2. how the “Prophets of Strong Drink – Part 2 – Fashioning Sin’s Image” guides your daily life.

    This will help me better interact with you comment. Thank-you.

    In Christ, Tom

  • bbdemy99@hotmail.com'
    Bob Demyanovich commented on September 14, 2014 Reply

    Dear Tom.

    The entirety Kuyper contemplates is creation. Prophecy is evident God is apart from time. Creation then is not spontaneous so our Redeemer, the lamb slain from the foundation of the world, when the works were finished, is a part of and is the Creator. Now then, Adam was suffered as a component of creation that was known from the foundation of the world. This is the unity of the Word of God, Jesus Christ the same yesterday and today and forever whom Kuyper recognizes as not a new divinity. The consideration of sin as the will, not necessarily the act as Kuyper relates has support within the piece shared in my previous post

    Daniel Irving’s “Prophets of Strong Drink – Part 2 – Fashioning Sin’s Image” touches on this continuity of creation Kuyper recognizes. Irving notices that Adam only was capable to cause all, both small and great to receive a mark heretofore. This mark, blemish and contamination is in the flesh, in the beast created from the dust of the earth that is condemned to produce thorns and thistles. Here then is the human component of creation, the contention of spirit and flesh and why the flesh cannot please God. Irving cites Job’s recognition that Adam’s true sin was will, not merely tasting the forbidden fruit.

    Job 31:33 If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding mine iniquity in my bosom:

    To your second question “Prophets of Strong Drink – Part 2 – Fashioning Sin’s Image” paired with Kuyper’s conception help us understand who we are. Human pride, human self-sufficiency supplants the will of God.

    • Tom Grosh IV commented on September 15, 2014 Reply

      Dear Bob,

      Thank-you for clarification.

      In Christ, Tom

Leave a Reply