Every year since 1987, March has been considered Women’s History Month. What started as International Women’s Day in 1911 became National Women’s History Week in 1980 and then a month designated to learning about and celebrating what women have contributed to history. Since we are approaching the end of Women’s History Month, I thought was appropriate to write a few women in science who were, or are, Christians. Officially they are a small group — according to an article published in Christianity Today, only ~7% of biologists and physicists in the US identify as Christian women. Nevertheless, there are a many remarkable women who belong to this group.
[Read more…] about Science Corner: Christian Women in Science
Jennifer Wiseman
Science Corner: 2019 BioLogos Conference Recap
Last week I had the opportunity to attend the BioLogos conference in Baltimore, MD. Although there is a healthy dose of science, their conferences have a different feel than American Scientific Affiliation meetings, or at least the one I attended. ASA is primarily focused on scientists and students in the sciences, while BioLogos positions itself to address a broader audience. As a result, their conference attracts pastors, middle and high school teachers and interested members of the public in addition to an assortment of academics in the sciences, philosophy, history, theology, and other disciplines.
To serve this audience, the meeting is oriented around plenary talks and cultivating the sense of a single shared conversation, rather than discipline-specific conversations in different tracks. These plenary talks were recorded and can be streamed online now; a single fee provides access to all the talks. While that fee is a considerable bargain compared to the expense of traveling to and attending the meeting in person, it may not fit into everyone’s budget. So I’ve written brief reflections on each talk to help you assess the value proposition of purchasing streaming access. Also, be sure to check out an upcoming free talk linked at the bottom of this post.
What Do You Believe, Doctor? – BioLogos founder and current NIH director Francis Collins shared how he came to follow Jesus early in his medical career, having previously not seen a need for religion in his life. Collins has the affable and reassuring disposition you’d want in a family doctor but might not expect from one of the world’s leading scientists and policymakers. It’s obvious why his story has resonated so strongly with so many.
Science, Faith, & Public Witness – Pastor John Ortburg shared what I felt was primarily a message of encouragement and exhortation to the scientists in attendance. He focused on 4 gifts that scientists can offer our brothers & sisters and our neighbors. As a pastor ministering in Silicon Valley, he obviously has plenty of opportunities to interact with those in STEM fields and clearly has a lot of respect for such folks.
Creation: Rediscovering a Misunderstood Doctrine – Theologian and historian Justo González reminded us all that creation is not just a doctrine about past events and a causal chain extending back to a first cause. That’s the scientific perspective on creation; the doctrine of creation is much richer.
Science and its Limits: Properly Receiving God’s Good Gift – Philosopher Timothy O’Connor took up the issue of scientism and the limits of what science can tell us, both about the physical world and about the sum total of all truth. I’ve recently had conversations with folks who expressed concern that BioLogos and evolutionary creationism represented an overconfidence in science, so I found this session to be particularly timely.
Life Beyond Earth: What Would it Mean for Christians? – This might be the densest presentation, science-wise. Astrophysicist Jennifer Wiseman recaps our recent advances in exoplanet discovery: what we’ve found, how we found them, how we might be able to identify signatures of life. Astrobiologist Stephen Freeland discusses the remarkably robust nature of microbial life and how pervasive and persistent it can be. Finally, astronomer and BioLogos president Deborah Haarsma surveys some of the theological questions associated with the topic of intelligent life elsewhere in the cosmos.
Night at the Aquarium: Christians and Creation Care – I’m sorry to say I did not purchase the additional ticket to attend this lecture at the aquarium, having been to the aquarium several times as a grad student.
Animal Suffering: God and Pain in the Evolutionary Story – Bethany Sollereder, a science & religion scholar, took up the challenging topic of theodicy through the particular lens of animal suffering. I presume Sollereder is or has been a teacher, since she helpfully began by surveying the breadth of possible approaches to the question of animal suffering before describing her personal approach. While not necessarily giving them equal time, I thought she gave all the views a clear and fair explanation. I also found her particular approach to make a lot of sense.
Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: Embryos & Ethics – Biologist Jeff Hardin describes how developing humans change shape over time as they transition from single-celled zygotes to infants. He has plenty of images and videos that inspire ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’. Then he explores some of the ethical questions around reproductive technologies and stem-cell-based therapies, such as what to do with embryos fertilized in surplus of what wound up being needed for achieving a pregnancy. He probably raises more questions than he offers answers for, acknowledging the need for policy experts and ethicists to contribute, but does offer some guidance.
Speaking God in a Scientific World: Reviving our Sacred Vocabulary – I was the most intrigued by journalist Jonathan Merritt’s premise, but ultimately found his talk underwhelming in execution. He makes an impassioned case for a decline in usage and understanding of sacred vocabulary (although I’m not entirely clear on whether Google n-gram data shows what he says it shows) and a need to transform our language to keep it alive. But no specifics are provided, nor is much of a connection made to a specifically “scientific world.†Eventually it became clear the details of transformation were saved for his new book; one or two examples would have been appreciated.
BioLogos 10th Anniversary Banquet – Francis Collins provides a history of the early days of BioLogos, then offers some commentary on where he thinks it should go in the next decade. He spent the most time making a case for leadership in the area of bioethics. His primary use case was the application of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology, which shows real therapeutic promise when used in somatic cells and which raises many concerns when used in embryos and germline cells. Few if any individuals are more qualified to speak to this topic.
Unfortunately, due to other obligations I had to leave prior to Richard Mouw’s presentation.
During the conference, BioLogos also launched a podcast called The Language of God. Four episodes are available so far, including conversations with conference speakers Francis Collins and Jennifer Wiseman, if you want a further sense of their style and perspective.
And in other live streaming but non-BioLogos news, mathematician and ESN member Francis Su will be giving a talk entitled The Integration of Faith and the Academic Calling at 12pm EDT tomorrow (4/4/19). You can register for a free video stream here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_HD8yXl0wTdSyxHMcIDtu8A
History of Science Recommendations from Ted Davis
Last week, Edward B. (“Tedâ€) Davis, Distinguished Professor of the History of Science at Messiah College (Grantham, PA) and outgoing president of the American Scientific Affiliation (ASA), shared with us how he became interested in History of Science and some tips for Emerging Scholars as they seek academic positions. In this second post, we explore recommended resources for those interested in the History of Science. Let’s get started …
Thomas B. Grosh IV [TG]: For members of ESN with an interest in History of Science [HSC], what resources would you recommend as a place to get started? Would you have a book recommendation for a campus discussion group?
Ted Davis [TD]: Unfortunately many of the best historians of science write little or nothing for “popular†audiences, i.e., non-scholars. Ironically, the book that has probably sold more copies than any other book in my field, Thomas Kuhn’s “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” (more than one million copies are reported to be in circulation), was written in terse academic prose for a very narrow audience, namely positivist philosophers of science—whose work was, equally ironically, all but undermined by Kuhn, even though he had not intended to do so. Readers who like Kuhn should be able to handle almost anything else in HSC, regardless of the audience for whom it was written. I had to read two of Kuhn’s books in Dr. Rosen’s course at Drexel, and I found both of them fascinating despite my very limited acquaintance with HSC at the time.
The kind of literature that could attract a person to HSC, however, might actually be something that was not written by a professional Historian of Science, such as the books on history of physics that I mentioned in the first part of this interview. A perfect example is Dava Sobel’s Galileo’s Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love. Sobel is neither a professional Historian nor even a scholar; she is a science writer who reads the professional scholars very carefully, understands them, and presents a very persuasive picture of Galileo life and his interactions with others in that book. I think that she’s a little too uncritical of the relationship between Galileo and his daughter, but overall the book is a very fine book. Anyone who likes that book might be interested in studying HSC. [Read more…] about History of Science Recommendations from Ted Davis
Week in Review: Kuyper at the World Cup Edition
What are you reading, watching, thinking about this week? As usual, here’s a few which have been on our mind. Let us know your thoughts on any/all of them. If you have items you’d like us to consider for the top five, add them in the comments or send them to Tom or Mike.
1. Christian Philosophy, Anyone?
I spent a week in May with about fifteen other people, reading and discussing key sections of a four-volume tome with the forbidding title A New Critique of Theoretical Thought. Most of those present confessed that they had great difficulty understanding the assigned passages, yet everyone agreed at the end that the week was a great success, and perhaps worth doing again. … What kind of philosophy could attract the interest of such a varied collection of intellectuals [? The answer is that it was the philosophy of the Dutch philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd (1894-1977), whose disciplinary specialty was actually not philosophy at all, but jurisprudence. He taught for many years at the Free University of Amsterdam, the Christian university founded by Abraham Kuyper, the leader of the great revival of culturally engaged Calvinism known as neocalvinism. … — Christian Philosophy, Anyone? (Al Wolters. Comment. 6/11/2010)
2. Free speech in a public, academic forum. What can we learn from the on-going discussion at UC-Irvine with regard to how voices are to be heard and how they are to interact? Any suggestions with regard to how such situations are to be addressed, in advance, during, afterward? Comment from Tom: The international world is on many U.S. campuses and most campuses lack the framework to engage in real, gritty cross-cultural conversation, let alone reshape perspective on the issues, the idealism is fading. Will shouting replace it on campus (including the administration/faculty) and the responses to incidents such as UC-Irvine?
The University of California at Irvine has suspended the campus’s Muslim Student Union for one year and placed the group on disciplinary probation after members of the group repeatedly interrupted a campus speech in February by Israel’s ambassador to the United States, according to a letter released on Monday.
The hecklers shouted down the ambassador, Michael Oren, at times calling him a “killer” and scuttling parts of the speech. Video of the event drew international attention and sparked a debate about the tactics of the protesters, who said they were angry about Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. — UC-Irvine Suspends Muslim Student Group for Disrupting Speech (Josh Keller. Chronicle of Higher Education. 14/2010)
[Read more…] about Week in Review: Kuyper at the World Cup Edition