<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week in Review: Big Questions Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/11/week-in-review-big-questions-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/11/week-in-review-big-questions-edition/</link>
	<description>From InterVarsity's Emerging Scholars Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grosh</title>
		<link>http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/11/week-in-review-big-questions-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.emergingscholars.org/?p=1616#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>More on Liberal Arts Education:  In &quot;A Defender of the Liberal Arts Contemplates Their Changing Role&quot; (David Glenn. Chronicle of Higher Education. 11/10/09, http://chronicle.com/article/A-Defender-of-the-Liberal-Arts/49098/), writer Azar Nafisi responds to the question, &quot;Why is it important for non-literature majors to study literature? Couldn&#039;t those courses be seen as a distraction from learning to be a competent doctor, or accountant, or whatever?&quot;

&quot;A. The great arguments about the value of the liberal arts for the professions have come from Martha Nussbaum. … Reading literature teaches you a way of thinking that is complicated and ambiguous. It prepares you for the ambiguities of your profession. It gives you density of thought. ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on Liberal Arts Education:  In &#8220;A Defender of the Liberal Arts Contemplates Their Changing Role&#8221; (David Glenn. Chronicle of Higher Education. 11/10/09, <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/A-Defender-of-the-Liberal-Arts/49098/)" rel="nofollow">http://chronicle.com/article/A-Defender-of-the-Liberal-Arts/49098/)</a>, writer Azar Nafisi responds to the question, &#8220;Why is it important for non-literature majors to study literature? Couldn&#8217;t those courses be seen as a distraction from learning to be a competent doctor, or accountant, or whatever?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;A. The great arguments about the value of the liberal arts for the professions have come from Martha Nussbaum. … Reading literature teaches you a way of thinking that is complicated and ambiguous. It prepares you for the ambiguities of your profession. It gives you density of thought. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
