http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/09/the-ethics-of-science-pr/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-ethics-of-science-pr From InterVarsity's Emerging Scholars Network Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:34:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/09/the-ethics-of-science-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-1605 Dave Snoke Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:07:57 +0000 http://blog.emergingscholars.org/?p=1417#comment-1605 Thanks for the work on my post. I am not only asking whether "hype" hurts the cause of evolution and other science areas. I am also asking whether the deliberate suppression of works that question evolution hurts the cause of science and evolution. I have seen ID papers that were quite reasonable that question basic claims of common descent. Yet there seems to be a feeling that scientists must present a front that all such claims are not to be taken seriously, that they are "just religion." Thanks for the work on my post.
I am not only asking whether “hype” hurts the cause of evolution and other science areas. I am also asking whether the deliberate suppression of works that question evolution hurts the cause of science and evolution. I have seen ID papers that were quite reasonable that question basic claims of common descent. Yet there seems to be a feeling that scientists must present a front that all such claims are not to be taken seriously, that they are “just religion.”

]]>