<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First impressions of BioLogos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/04/first-impressions-of-biologos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/04/first-impressions-of-biologos/</link>
	<description>From InterVarsity's Emerging Scholars Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:51:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micheal Hickerson</title>
		<link>http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/04/first-impressions-of-biologos/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheal Hickerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.emergingscholars.org/?p=835#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Neil, thank you for your comment, but is that your only complaint with BioLogos?  Question 19 is &quot;What is the “fine-tuning” of the universe, and how does it serve as a “pointer to God”?&quot;  BioLogos&#039; answer to the question is mostly an overview of the topic of &quot;fine tuning,&quot; and includes a number of possible counter-explanations.  They quote Hawking to set up a much longer article, not as an authority in favor of their position, and they provide a clear reference, and even a link, to Hawking&#039;s article. Maybe you don&#039;t like their answer, but using this quote from Hawking is hardly a cardinal sin (especially if their first 18 questions passed muster).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, thank you for your comment, but is that your only complaint with BioLogos?  Question 19 is &#8220;What is the “fine-tuning” of the universe, and how does it serve as a “pointer to God”?&#8221;  BioLogos&#8217; answer to the question is mostly an overview of the topic of &#8220;fine tuning,&#8221; and includes a number of possible counter-explanations.  They quote Hawking to set up a much longer article, not as an authority in favor of their position, and they provide a clear reference, and even a link, to Hawking&#8217;s article. Maybe you don&#8217;t like their answer, but using this quote from Hawking is hardly a cardinal sin (especially if their first 18 questions passed muster).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/04/first-impressions-of-biologos/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.emergingscholars.org/?p=835#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Any group that quote-mines Stephen Hawking is not good.

See question 19.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any group that quote-mines Stephen Hawking is not good.</p>
<p>See question 19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald G. Pasco</title>
		<link>http://blog.emergingscholars.org/2009/04/first-impressions-of-biologos/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald G. Pasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.emergingscholars.org/?p=835#comment-732</guid>
		<description>As a Christian anthropologist, I am very pleased to see \good science\ applied to the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Christian anthropologist, I am very pleased to see \good science\ applied to the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
